Prediction of Trey Hilderbrand [646th] vs Viktor Markov [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L L L
Form
L L W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Hilderbrand 1 - 0 Markov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 2 and Markov winning 0. The last match between Hilderbrand and Markov was at the Champaign Challenger, 10-11-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Trey Hilderbrand getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Trey Hilderbrand | 1 |
| Viktor Markov | 0 |
| Hilderbrand | Stats | Markov |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (8-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 646 | Ranking | N/A |
| 620 | Highest Rank | |
| 24 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (92-66) | Career Total W/L | 53% (19-17) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Hilderbrand VS Markov H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Viktor Markov
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Hilderbrand VS Markov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:48:36 | Average Match Time | 0:48:36 |
| 67% (28/42) | 1st Serve % | 50% (21/42) |
| 82% (23/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 64% (9/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (23/42) | Return Points Win % | 24% (10/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Trey Hilderbrand vs Viktor Markov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hilderbrand 1 - 0 Markov
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hilderbrand has won 39.82% of points on their second serve, while Markov has won 45.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hilderbrand, in recent form, has won 45.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Markov has won 46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.6% and 22.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hilderbrand has saved 50.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Markov has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hilderbrand has won 52.5% of matches played (W/L 21/ 19), with Markov winning 61.11% (W/L 11/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hilderbrand has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 52/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8). Markov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 16/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hilderbrand has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18), where as Markov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hilderbrand winning 1 times and Markov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hilderbrand winning 2 and Markov winning 0. The last match between Hilderbrand and Markov was at the Champaign Challenger, 10-11-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Trey Hilderbrand getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hilderbrand and Markov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hilderbrand winning 0 times and Markov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hilderbrand winning 0, and Markov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hilderbrand has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.3 while Markov has played against players with an average rank of 42.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hilderbrand has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Markov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hilderbrand has converted 48.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Markov has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Trey Hilderbrand vs Viktor Markov Best Odds For The Match
Trey Hilderbrand Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nicolas Villalon
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Diego Bustamante
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Jagger Leach
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nathan Ponwith
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
14
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
James Tracy
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
78 of
126)
15
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
115
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Viktor Markov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Max Basing
Player
Viktor Markov
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
107)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Viktor Markov
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Player
Viktor Markov
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Markov
Player
William Manning
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 15-13 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Tammaro
Player
Viktor Markov
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Markov
Player
Dinko Dinev
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Savva Polukhin
Player
Viktor Markov
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Hilderbrand vs Markov?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Hilderbrand Vs Markov is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (92/66) | Win/Loss | 53% (19/17) |
| 58% (211/155) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (42/39) |
| 53% (1835/1625) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (424/396) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 728 | Aces Total | 49 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 485 | Total Double Faults | 80 |
| 1:4:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 147.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 73.14 |
| 61% (4197/6900) | 1st Serve % | 54% (640/1196) |
| 72% (3033/4197) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (425/640) |
| 47% (1268/2703) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (241/556) |
| 41% (260/639) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (60/126) |
| 38% (2586/6878) | Return Points Win % | 43% (513/1190) |
| 59% (92/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (19/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 47% (24/51) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 86% (95/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (19/16) |
| 14% (95/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (19/3) |
| 16% (63/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) |
See recent tennis photos of Hilderbrand and Markov
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
